An ambitious 81-page document, Fear, Inc. 2.0: The
Islamophobia Network’s Efforts to Manufacture Hate in America, just appeared
from the Center for American Progress, a liberal Democratic organization.
Unlike its first iteration, in which a group with a $40-million annual budget
and deep ties to big business had the nerve to claim that seven much smaller
institutions were overpowering the country through their financial clout, this
one looks at what the alleged “Islamophobia network” actually does.
The report, written by Matthew Duss, Yasmine Taeb, Ken Gude,
and Ken Sofer, makes for interesting reading. Its premise is that critics of
Islamism (1) are really anti-Islamic and (2) have single-handedly distorted a
the fundamental American value, namely a “basic respect for the rights of
minority groups throughout the country.” According to the CAP study, “the views
of anti-Muslim actors stand in stark contrast to the values of most Americans.”
By dint of hard work, however, “a well-funded,
well-organized fringe movement can push discriminatory policies against a
segment of American society by intentionally spreading lies while taking
advantage of moments of public anxiety and fear.” This effort “takes many
shapes and forms”: a general climate, cynical political efforts, and
institutional policies. Despite some setbacks, continues the CAP narrative, the
network’s efforts “continue to erode America’s core values of religious
pluralism, civil rights, and social inclusion.”
Those fingered as part of this network (I am one) should be
perversely proud of our accomplishment: Just a handful of individuals lying
manage to subvert a core American value – and all this with what CAP itself
estimated to be less than $5 million a year!
But there is a more convincing reason why Americans fear
Islam and Muslims. The news is filled almost daily and even several times daily
with bulletins from one Islamist front or another. I hardly need rehearse the
repertoire; just turn to the day’s headlines. ISIS and the Charlie Hebdo-like
massacre most dominate the news, but Islamists are all the time winning
unfavorable attention for themselves by making aggressive cultural demands
(say, wearing a face-covering burqa in the courtroom), pushing the superiority
of Islam (don’t dare say a negative word about Muhammad), or apologizing for
some repulsive practice (such as honor killings or female genital mutilation).
Another way of putting it: the United States hosts about as
many Buddhists and Hindus combined as it does Muslims. Yet, when did Buddhists
or Hindus try to change the existing order or engage in violence on behalf of
their faiths? Who ever hears about them? Who fears them?
Maybe it’s Islamists who are prompting powerful and
spontaneous responses through their threatening behavior. Maybe we critics are
not “intentionally spreading lies” but honestly interpreting Islamist
aggression and supremacism. Maybe CAP and its ilk should blame the fear of
Islam less on we critics and more on the Islamists themselves.
Credit to National Review Online.
No comments:
Post a Comment